Effectiveness of an individually-tailored computerised CBT programme (Deprexis) for depression: A meta-analysis.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Twomey, Conal
O'Reilly, Gary
Meyer, Björn

Issue Date

2017-06-27

Type

Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review

Language

en

Keywords

Computerised CBT , Depression , Deprexis , Internet interventions , Meta-analysis

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (cCBT) programmes differ widely but have rarely been evaluated separately through meta-analysis. Through a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, we investigated the effectiveness of 'Deprexis', an unconventional and individually-tailored cCBT programme for depression. Comparisons from eight studies (N = 2402) demonstrated the effectiveness of Deprexis for depressive symptoms at post-intervention, with a medium effect size (g = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39-0.69). Analogous results arose when study quality, screening, and randomisation procedure were taken into account. The level of guidance provided alongside Deprexis had a statistically non-significant impact upon the effect size. There was no significant difference in the performance of Deprexis in developer-led trials compared with non-developer trials, and no publication bias was detected. The weighted-average dropout rate for participants allocated to Deprexis treatment arms in included studies was 26.5%. Based primarily on trials in naturalistic community settings, the findings support the effectiveness of Deprexis for depressive symptoms. The positive findings add to the growing evidence-base for individually-tailored cCBT programmes and point to the need for further investigations of apparent systematic differences in the effectiveness of specific cCBT programmes.

Description

Citation

Twomey, C., O'Reilly, G., & Meyer, B. (2017). Effectiveness of an individually-tailored computerised CBT programme (Deprexis) for depression: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry research, 256, 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.081

Publisher

License

Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Journal

Psychiatry research

Volume

256

Issue

PubMed ID

ISSN

1872-7123

EISSN

Collections